Desafíos de la educación moral y ciudadana ante las tecnologías emergentes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56162/transdigital18Palabras clave:
Tecnologías emergentes, principios éticos, psicología moral, educación moral, educación para la controversiaResumen
La creciente brecha entre el acelerado desarrollo de nuevas, convergentes e invasivas tecnologías (genómica, robótica, inteligencia artificial, nanotecnologías, realidad aumentada, etc.) y los lentos procesos legislativos que deberían regularlas, puede encararse a través de regulaciones “suaves” o éticas, en las cuales los principios morales juegan un rol fundamental. Esto parece implicar la necesidad de esfuerzos dinámicos y generalizados en materia de educación moral y ciudadana, pero algunas tendencias recientes de la psicología moral han cuestionado el valor de los principios morales, del razonamiento moral y de la educación moral toda. En paralelo, el realce moral biotecnológico (edición genética, moléculas morales, implantes cerebrales, etc.) recibe creciente atención. Después de presentar una revisión esquemática de la psicología contemporánea de la educación moral, reafirmamos la importancia del razonamiento moral basado en principios, así como de una educación moral democrática que sea capaz de lidiar con la naturaleza altamente controversial de las tecnologías emergentes.
Citas
Allenby, B. R. (2011). Governance and Technology Systems: The Challenge of Emerging Technologies. En G. E. Marchant, B. R. Allenby, y J. R. Herkert (Eds.). The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight. The Pacing Problem (pp. 3-18). Dordrecht: Springer.
Andrejevic, M. (2014). Surveillance in the Big Data Era. En K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Emerging Pervasive Information and Communication Technologies (PICT). Ethical Challenges, Opportunities and Safeguards, (pp. 55-70). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bekoff, M., y Pierce, J. (2009). Wild Justice: The Moral Lives of Animals. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Buxarrais, M. R., y Ortega, E. (2019). Controversies are no excuse: Citizenship education in Spain. Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 14(3), 331-346. https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00013_1
Cabrera, L. Y. (2015). Rethinking Human Enhancement: Social Enhancement and Emergent Technologies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Carter, R. B., y Marchant, G. E. (2011). Principles-Based Regulation and Emerging Technology. En G. E. Marchant, B. R. Allenby, y J. R. Herkert (Eds.). The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight. The Pacing Problem (pp. 157-166). Dordrecht: Springer.
Christensen, J. F., y Gomila, A. (2012). Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making: A principled review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 1249-1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.008
Conning, A. S. (2018). How People Learn to Think Globally: Mapping and Measuring the Development of Internormative Cognition [Disertación doctoral]. Recuperado de http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37935835
Damon, W., y Colby, A. (2015). The Power of Ideals: The Real Story of Moral Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Del Castillo, C. (2018). “La próxima revolución política será por el control de los algoritmos”. (Entrevista con Cathy O’Neil). Eldiario.es [Periódico en línea]. Recuperado de https://www.eldiario.es/tecnologia/proxima-revolucion-politica-control-algoritmos_0_830117867.html
Del Castillo, C. (2019). Los científicos se cansan de la moda de la Inteligencia Artificial y piden prohibir algunos de sus usos: “No se sostienen”. Eldiario.es [Periódico en línea]. Recuperado de https://www.eldiario.es/tecnologia/cientificos-Inteligencia-Artificial-prohibir-sostienen_0_975002803.html
De Waal, F. (1996). Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
De Waal, F. (2006). Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Douglas, T. (2014). Moral Enhancement. En R. L. Sandler (Ed.). Ethics and Emerging Technologies, pp. 235-251. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Eres, R., Louis, W. R., y Molenberghs, P. (2017). Common and distinct neural networks involved in fMRI studies investigating morality: An ALE meta-analysis, Social Neuroscience https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2017.1357657
Farías, L. (2017). Desafíos interdisciplinarios y sociales de la psicología moral contemporánea: Apertura y reflexividad. Anuari de Psicologia de la Societat Valenciana de Psicologia, 18(2), 61-88. https://doi.org/10.7203/anuari.psicologia.18.2.61
García, T., y Sandler, R. (2014). Enhancing Justice? En R. L. Sandler (Ed.). Ethics and Emerging Technologies, pp. 252-266. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gibbs, J. C. (2014). Moral development and reality: beyond the theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman and Haidt (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gibbs, J. C., Basinger, K. S., Grime, R. L., y Snarey, J. R. (2007). Moral judgment development accross cultures: Revisiting Kohlberg’s universality claims. Developmental Review, 27, 443-500.
González, L. (2012, febrero 5). Educación paa la Ciudadanía: la polémica, fuera del aula. El Mundo [Diario en línea]. Recuperado de https://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2012/02/03/espana/1328259062.html
Gray, K., y Graham, J. (Eds.) (2018). Atlas of Moral Psychology. New York: The Guilford Press.
Gray, V. (2018). Why “Moral Enhancement” Isn’t Always Moral Enhancement: The Case of Traumatic Brain Injury in American Vets. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 43, 527-546. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhy022
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., y Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2108.
Haidt, J. (2001). The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814-834. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X. 108.4.814
Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind. Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon Books.
Haidt, J., Rozin, P., McCauley, C. R., y Imada, S. (1997). Body, psyche, and culture: The relationship between disgust and morality. Psychology and Developing Societies, 9, 107-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/097133369700900105
Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the Classroom. The Democratic Power of Discussion. New York: Routledge.
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2011). An Epidemic of False Claims. Competition and conflicts of interest distort too many medical findings. Scientific American [Página en línea]. Recuperado de https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/an-epidemic-of-false-claims/
Jotterand, F. (2014). Questioning the Moral Enhancement Project. The American Journal of Bioethics, 14(4), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2014.905031
Kahneman, D. (2013). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
Killen, M., y Dahl, A. (2018). Moral Judgment: Reflective, Interactive, Spontaneous, Challenging and Always Evolving. En Gray, K., y Graham, J. (Eds.) (2018). Atlas of Moral Psychology (pp. 37-61). New York: The Guilford Press.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on Moral Development (Vols. 1-2). San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Landrum, A. R., Olshansky, A., y Richards, O. (2019). Differential susceptibility to misleading flat earth arguments on youtube. Media Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1669461
Levinson, R. (2008). Promoting the role of the personal narrative in teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. Science & Education, 17, 855-871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9076-8
Luque, A. (2019, diciembre 19). Ante el juez un profesor por proyectar en clase un vídeo de Ana Orantes contra la violencia de género. El Mundo [Diario en línea]. Recuperado de https://www.elmundo.es/andalucia/2019/12/17/5df92a17fdddff77738b45de.html
Lucivero, F. (2016). Ethical Assessments of Emerging Technologies: Appraising the moral plausibility of technological visions. Cham: Springer.
Marchant, G. E. (2011). The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and the Law. En G. E. Marchant, B. R. Allenby, y J. R. Herkert (Eds.). The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight. The Pacing Problem (pp. 19-34). Dordrecht: Springer.
Marchant, G. E., Allenby, B. R., y Herkert, J. R. (Eds.) (2011). The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight. The Pacing Problem. Dordrecht: Springer.
Martí, M., Samper, P., y Díez, I. (1997). L’Impacte de L. Kohlberg en la Psicologia Contemporània (1989-1997). Anuari de Psicologia de la Societat Valenciana de Psicologia, 4(1), 24-39.
Maxwell, B., y Beaulac, G. (2013). The concept of the moral domain in moral foundations theory and cognitive developmental theory: Horses for courses? Journal of Moral Education, 42(3), 360-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2013.818530
Maxwell, B., McDonough, K., y Waddington, D. I. (2018). Broaching the subject: Developing law-based principles for teacher free speech in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 196-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.020
McGregor, J., y Wetmore, J. (2009). Researching and Teaching the Ethics and Social Implications of Emerging Technologies in the Laboratory. Nanoethics, 3, 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-009-0055-1
Narvaez, D. (2014). Neurobiology and the Development of Human Morality: Evolution, Culture, and Wisdom. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Narvaez, D. (2016). Embodied morality: protectionism, engagement and imagination. New York: Springer.
Narvaez, D. (Ed.) (2018). Basic Needs, Wellbeing and Morality: Fulfilling Human Potential. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nucci, L. (2009). Nice Is Not Enough: Facilitating Moral Development. New Jersey: Pearson.
Palazzani, L. (2019). Innovation in Scientific Research and Emerging Technologies. A Challenge to Ethics and Law. Cham: Springer – Giappicheli.
Paulo, N., y Bublitz, J. C. (2019). How (not) to Argue for Moral Enhancement: Reflections on a Decade of Debate. Topoi, 38, 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9492-6
Persson, I., y Savulescu, J. (2015). Reply to commentators on “Unfit for the Future”. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(4), 348-352.
Petrie, (Director). (1999). La herencia del viento [Cinta cinematográfica]. Estados Unidos: MGM Television – Showtime Networks.
Picheta, R. (2019, Nov. 18). The flat-Earth conspiracy is spreading around the globe. Does it hide a darker core? CNN. Recuperado de https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/16/us/flat-earth-conference-conspiracy-theories-scli-intl/index.html
Pimple, K. D. (Ed.) (2014). Emerging Pervasive Information and Communication Technologies (PICT). Ethical Challenges, Opportunities and Safeguards. Dordrecht: Springer.
Pimple, K. D. (2014b). Introduction: The Impact, Benefits, and Hazards of PICT. En K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Emerging Pervasive Information and Communication Technologies (PICT). Ethical Challenges, Opportunities and Safeguards, (pp. 1-12). Dordrecht: Springer.
Pimple, K. D. (2014c). Principles for the Ethical Guidance of PICT. En K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Emerging Pervasive Information and Communication Technologies (PICT). Ethical Challenges, Opportunities and Safeguards, (pp. 219-225). Dordrecht: Springer.
Prehn, K., Korczykowski, M., Rao, H., Fang, Z., Detre, J. A., y Robertson, D. C. (2015). Neural Correlates of Post-Conventional Moral Reasoning: A Voxel-Based Morphometry Study. PLoS ONE, 10(6): e0122914. https://doi.org/1371/journal.pone.0122914
Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., y Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian approach. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rotolo, D., Hicks, D., y Martin, B. R. (2015). What Is an Emerging Technology? Research Policy, 44(10), 1827-1843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.006
Shaw, E. (2018). Retributivism and the Moral Enhancement of Criminals Through Brain Interventions. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 83, 251-270. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246118000383
Shook, J. R., y Giordano, J. (2016). Moral Enhancement? Acknowledging Limitations of Neurotechnology and Morality. AJOB Neuroscience, 7(2), 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2016.1188178
Stahl, B. C. (2011). Emerging Information and Communication Technologies and Their Social Consequences. En M. Chiasson, O. Henfridsson, H. Karsten, y J. I. DeGross (Eds.). Researching the Future in Information Systems (pp. 95-108). Heidelberg: Springer.
Van den Bos, K. (2018). The Possibility of Intuitive and Deliberative Processes Working in Parallel in Moral Judgment. En K. Gray, & J. Graham (Eds.) (2018). Atlas of Moral Psychology (pp. 62-80). New York: The Guilford Press.
Wassom, B. D. (2014). Augmented Reality Law, Privacy, and Ethics. Law, Society, and Emerging AR Technologies. Waltham: Elsevier.
Wiseman, H. (2016). The Myth of the Moral Brain. The Limits of Moral Enhancement. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Autor de correspondencia
El autor de correspodencia se identifica con el siguiente símbolo: *Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Categorías
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Maria Rosa Buxarrais Estrada, Levy Farías
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Todos los artículos en Transdigital están licenciados bajo Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Los autores poseen los derechos de autor y conservan los derechos de publicación sin restricciones.
