Automation of administrative texts and formal communication with ChatGPT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56162/transdigital297

Keywords:

Computer literacy, Writing (composition), Artificial intelligence

Abstract

Text creation processes are undergoing profound transformations driven by the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly by Large Language Models (LLM) such as ChatGPT. In Mexico, an increase in the use of LLMs has been observed among university students, who primarily employ them to gather information without verification and generate complete tasks based on a few sentences. These uses are often unbeneficial as they can lead to the spread of false or imprecise information and, in many cases, academic dishonesty ensues. In response to these challenges, this scientific essay proposes a technique for automating the drafting of administrative and formal communication texts, specifically designed for the university environment, and utilizing ChatGPT. The technique is divided into four phases: 1) Identification of the text type; 2) Gather of information; 3) Generation of the prompt; and 4) Review. It is expected that this article will contribute to raising awareness about the limitations and potential errors of ChatGPT while highlighting its practical applications. Additionally, it is anticipated that this technique will streamline the drafting of simple texts, enabling individuals to free up time for more complex tasks.

References

Avgerinou, M. D., Karampelas, A., & Stefanou, V. (2023). Building the Plane as We Fly It: Experimenting with GenAI for Scholarly Writing. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v7i2.128

Bañales Faz, G., Castelló Badía, M., & Vega López, N. A. (2016). Enseñar a leer y escribir en la educación superior. Propuestas educativas basadas en la investigación. Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Fundación SM.

Bishop, L. (2023, January 26). A Computer Wrote this Paper: What ChatGPT Means for Education, Research, and Writing. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4338981

Camps, A., & Castelló, M. (2013). La escritura académica en la universidad. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 11(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2013.5590

Carlino, P. (2013). Alfabetización académica diez años después. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 18(57), 355–381. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-66662013000200003

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Gee, J. P. (2015). The New Literacy Studies. En J. Rowsell & K. Pahl (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Literacy Studies (pp. 35–48). Routledge.

Hsiao, Y. P., Klijn, N., & Chiu, M. S. (2023). Developing a framework to re-design writing assignment assessment for the era of Large Language Models. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2023.2257234

Larrea, M. de L. (2018). ¿Cómo se mide el acoso sexual? Sistematización de la experiencia de construcción de contenidos de un instrumento para la medición del acoso sexual en instituciones de educación superior del Ecuador. Fundación Donum-FOS. https://saludyderechos.fundaciondonum.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/machometro-baja-res.pdf

Lo, C. K. (2023). What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature. Education Sciences, 13(410), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

OpenAI. (2022a, January 27). Aligning language models to follow instructions. Research. https://openai.com/research/instruction-following

OpenAI. (2022b, November 30). Introducing ChatGPT. OpenAI Blog. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt

Padilla Partida, S. (2018). Teachers trainner’s uses and attitudes before ICT. Between the advisible and the reality of classrooms. Apertura, 10(1), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.32870/ap.v10n1.1107

Park, S. H. (2023). Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence, Including Large Language Models Such as ChatGPT, in Scientific Publications: Policies of KJR and Prominent Authorities. Korean Journal of Radiology, 24(8), 715–718. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2023.0643

Roose, K. (2023, January 12). Don’t Ban ChatGPT in Schools. Teach With It. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/12/technology/chatgpt-schools-teachers.html

Ruiz Mendoza, K. K. (2023). El uso de ChatGPT 4.0 para la elaboración de exámenes: crear el prompt adecuado. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v4i2.1040

Santiago-Ruiz, E. (2023). Writing with ChatGPT in a context of educational inequality and digital divide. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 19(3), 28–38. http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=3268

Stokel-Walker, C. (2022). AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays-should academics worry? Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-04397-7

UNESCO. (2023). ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence in higher education Quick start guide. The United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. http://en.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en

Autor de correspondencia

El autor de correspodencia se identifica con el siguiente símbolo: *

Published

11-02-2024

How to Cite

Santiago-Ruiz, E. (2024). Automation of administrative texts and formal communication with ChatGPT. Transdigital, 5(9), e297. https://doi.org/10.56162/transdigital297

Issue

Section

Scientific essays

Categories